i18n: fix syntax issue in behavioral guides

package.json

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
     "format-mdx": "prettier --write \"packages/**/en-US.{md,mdx}\"",
     "i18n": "npm run i18n:download && npm run i18n:fix",
     "i18n:download": "crowdin download",
+    "i18n:upload": "crowdin upload",
     "i18n:fix": "find packages -type f -name '*.mdx' -exec sed -i '' -e 's/{\\/_/{\\/*/g' -e 's/_\\/}/\\*\\/}/g' {} +"
   },
   "devDependencies": {

packages/behavioral-interview-guidebook/contents/collaboration/en-US.mdx

@@ -171,15 +171,15 @@ Add in specific details according to your situation.
 
 As alluded to in our [behavioral interview preparation overview](/behavioral-interview-guidebook), interviewers are encouraged to rely more on follow-up questions to really understand the candidate's thought process and motivations, which typically fall under these categories:
 
-- Why do you think you did \{...\}?
-- Why did you not do \{...\}?
+- Why do you think you did (insert action)?
+- Why did you not do (insert action)?
 - How would you do things differently in hindsight?
 
 For questions on collaboration, interviewers will most likely probe for questions to help them understand a bit more about:
 
 - **Understanding if and why certain stakeholders were involved or not involved**
   - Which stakeholders were involved in the discussion, and why?
-  - Why were certain stakeholders like \{...\} excluded from the group?
+  - Why were certain stakeholders like (insert stakeholder) excluded from the group?
 - **Understanding group dynamics and how it affected the strategy to handle the group**
   - Which personalities were present in the group and how did it affect dynamics? Did this understanding affect your strategy to navigate group discussions?
 - **Understanding the candidate's mindset to conflict**

packages/behavioral-interview-guidebook/contents/collaboration/pt-BR.mdx

@@ -171,15 +171,15 @@ Add in specific details according to your situation.
 
 As alluded to in our [behavioral interview preparation overview](/behavioral-interview-guidebook), interviewers are encouraged to rely more on follow-up questions to really understand the candidate's thought process and motivations, which typically fall under these categories:
 
--   Why do you think you did {...}?
--   Why did you not do {...}?
+-   Why do you think you did (insert action)?
+-   Why did you not do (insert action)?
 -   How would you do things differently in hindsight?
 
 For questions on collaboration, interviewers will most likely probe for questions to help them understand a bit more about:
 
 -   **Understanding if and why certain stakeholders were involved or not involved**
     -   Which stakeholders were involved in the discussion, and why?
-    -   Why were certain stakeholders like {...} excluded from the group?
+    -   Why were certain stakeholders like (insert stakeholder) excluded from the group?
 -   **Understanding group dynamics and how it affected the strategy to handle the group**
     -   Which personalities were present in the group and how did it affect dynamics? Did this understanding affect your strategy to navigate group discussions?
 -   **Understanding the candidate's mindset to conflict**

packages/behavioral-interview-guidebook/contents/collaboration/zh-CN.mdx

@@ -171,15 +171,15 @@ description: 学习如何回答针对前端/网络开发人员/软件工程师
 
 正如我们的[行为面试准备概述](/behavioral-interview-guidebook)中所提到的，鼓励面试官更多地依靠后续问题来真正了解候选人的思维过程和动机，这些问题通常属于这些类别：
 
--   为什么你认为你做了{....}？
--   为什么你不做{..}？
+-   你为什么认为你做了(行为)？
+-   你为什么不做(行为)？
 -   事后看，你会如何以不同的方式做事？
 
 对于有关合作的问题，面试官很可能会探询一些问题，以帮助他们了解更多的情况：
 
 -   **了解某些利益攸关方是否以及为何参与或不参与**
     -   哪些利益攸关方参与了讨论，以及为什么？
-    -   为什么某些利益攸关方如{..} 被排除在群组之外？
+    -   为什么某些利益攸关方如(某某) 被排除在群组之外？
 -   **了解群组动态以及它如何影响处理群组的策略**
     -   小组中存在哪些个性，它是如何影响动态的？ 这种理解是否影响了你驾驭小组讨论的策略？
 -   **理解候选人对冲突的心态**

packages/behavioral-interview-guidebook/contents/overview/en-US.mdx

@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ Additionally, it is important for candidates to avoid rambling on for long perio
 
 Apart from that, interviewers are typically encouraged to utilize follow-up questions to dig deeper into the candidate's actual motivations and understanding behind their surface-level actions.:
 
-1. Why do you think you did \{...\}?
-1. Why did you not do \{...\}?
+1. Why do you think you did (insert action)?
+1. Why did you not do (insert action)?
 1. How would you do things differently in hindsight?
 
 Hence, candidates should also prepare a solid understanding of each alternative mode of action's advantages, disadvantages, and reflect on their intrinsic motivations.

packages/behavioral-interview-guidebook/contents/overview/pt-BR.mdx

@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ Additionally, it is important for candidates to avoid rambling on for long perio
 
 Apart from that, interviewers are typically encouraged to utilize follow-up questions to dig deeper into the candidate's actual motivations and understanding behind their surface-level actions.:
 
-1.  Why do you think you did {...}?
-2.  Why did you not do {...}?
+1.  Why do you think you did (insert action)?
+2.  Why did you not do (insert action)?
 3.  How would you do things differently in hindsight?
 
 Hence, candidates should also prepare a solid understanding of each alternative mode of action's advantages, disadvantages, and reflect on their intrinsic motivations.

packages/behavioral-interview-guidebook/contents/overview/zh-CN.mdx

@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ description: 前端/网络开发人员/软件工程师的行为面试指南，
 
 除此之外，面试官通常鼓励利用跟进问题深入了解候选人的实际动机和理解其表面行动背后的原因。
 
-1.  为什么你认为你做了{....}？
-2.  您为什么不做{....}？
+1.  你为什么认为你做了(行为)？
+2.  你为什么不做(行为)？
 3.  你会怎么在后见之明中改变事情？
 
 因此，候选人还应准备对每种行动方式的利与弊有扎实的了解，并反思自己的内在动机。

packages/behavioral-interview-guidebook/contents/problem-solving/en-US.mdx

@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ We recommend you to also pick problem solving stories that can doubly serve to g
 
 As alluded to in our [behavioral interview preparation overview](/behavioral-interview-guidebook), interviewers are encouraged to rely more on follow-up questions to really understand the candidate's thought process and motivations, which typically fall under these categories:
 
-- Why do you think you did \{...\}?
-- Why did you not do \{...\}?
+- Why do you think you did (insert action)?
+- Why did you not do (insert action)?
 - How would you do things differently in hindsight?
 
 For questions on problem solving or drive for results, interviewers will most likely probe for questions to help them understand a bit more about:

packages/behavioral-interview-guidebook/contents/problem-solving/pt-BR.mdx

@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ We recommend you to also pick problem solving stories that can doubly serve to g
 
 As alluded to in our [behavioral interview preparation overview](/behavioral-interview-guidebook), interviewers are encouraged to rely more on follow-up questions to really understand the candidate's thought process and motivations, which typically fall under these categories:
 
--   Why do you think you did {...}?
--   Why did you not do {...}?
+-   Why do you think you did (insert action)?
+-   Why did you not do (insert action)?
 -   How would you do things differently in hindsight?
 
 For questions on problem solving or drive for results, interviewers will most likely probe for questions to help them understand a bit more about:

packages/behavioral-interview-guidebook/contents/problem-solving/zh-CN.mdx

@@ -149,8 +149,8 @@ description: 描述：学习如何回答有关前端/网络开发人员/软件
 
 正如我们在[行为面试准备概述]中所提到的，面试官鼓励依靠后续问题更多地了解候选人的思考过程和动机，这些后续问题通常属于以下类别：
 
--   你为什么认为你做了{...}？
--   为什么没有做{...}？
+-   你为什么认为你做了(行为)？
+-   你为什么不做(行为)？
 -   如果换成后见之明，你会如何做事情？
 
 在解决问题或实现结果的问题上，面试官最有可能探究这样的问题，以帮助他们更好地了解候选人：